There are only two things wrong with democracy.  They are:
 - 
  Those who vote
 
 
 - 
  Those they vote for
 
 
Those who vote
 The average intelligence of the general population of every country is
 average.  But don't let the word average fool you.
 It really means that on average, humanity's as thick as two short planks.
 When it comes to voting, the small percentage of intelligent people doesn't
 matter.  Those who matter are the great unwashed.  And this group has only
 a tenuous grip on reality.  We all know the Greeks have been living beyond
 their means on borrowed money for years.  When it finally caught up with them
 and they needed to curb their lifestyles and get their hands dirty and work,
 they demonstrated and had protest marches.  They wanted to keep on living
 beyond their means on borrowed money forever and ever.  How they saw that
 as possible, they didn't say.
 When the French government recently wanted to introduce legislation to make French
 industry more competitive by giving greater power to employers, the French
 took to the streets.  They demanded that their jobs stay highly paid, secure
 and with generous perks.  They didn't say how they planned to be competitive
 with mostly Eastern countries where workers don't have it so well.
 The whole democracy issue is best summarised by a quote attributed
 to Robert Heinlein; Once the monkeys learn they can vote themselves
 bananas, they'll never climb another tree.  Benjamin Franklin said
 much the same; When the people find that they can vote themselves
 money that will herald the end of the republic.  And this is the crux
 of the matter, the great unwashed will want what they want irrespective
 of whether what they want is reasonable and realistic.  And they will
 vote for those promising them what they want.
 In Australia, young people from all over the world come on extended
 holidays.  They don't have much money, so they stay in modest accommodation
 known as backpacker lodges.  They themselves are referred to as backpackers.
 Many of them take up menial work to supplement their funds, mostly things
 like fruit picking in season.  Australians don't want to do this kind of work.
 As much of this work is on a cash basis, the government doesn't get what
 they regard as their fair share of this money.  Just now, on TV, a
 politician, maybe the relevant minister, talked about financing government.
 Back-packers featured prominently.  The government considered introducing a
 flat tax on them, but reconsidered as they thought it would discourage backpackers
 coming to Australia and doing really essential work and spending some money here.
 This politician bemoaned the fact that Australians won't take up this work, in
 which case these workers would be on the books and could be taxed.  In addition,
 these people would then not rely on
 
  Centrelink
 
 to keep them in the pink and in booze with enough left over for the horses,
 the poker machines (pokies), and the many kinds of sports betting available
 in Australia.  This politician said the government is deliberating how
 they can change things so that Australians will take up these jobs.
 Of course, laws could be changed to implement
 
  Paul's dictum
 : The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat.  But that
 will ensure that whichever party is in opposition will promise to undo
 these changes if they come into power.  The opposition will then be elected at
 the next election as sure as politicians have very generous perks.  It is,
 therefore, safe to say that Australians won't take up this lowly paid, hard work.
 Legalise compulsory higher wages for this work and the products generated won't be
 competitive in the world markets.
 Working mothers of newborns in Australia can get paid parental leave amounting to
 AUD672.60 per week before tax for a maximum of 18 weeks.  18 Weeks amount
 to four months.  Not only can new mothers get paid parental leave, there
 is also a Dad and Partner
 paid parental leave for the same amount, but only for two weeks.  Needless to say,
 there is a clamour to make these perks even more generous.
 And that's not all, 
 Domestic Violence Leave is also much in play in Australia.  In fact,
 the perpetrators 
  may be entitled to paid domestic violence leave
 .  This will surely make Australia more competitive in the world's markets
 and ensure jobs into the future.
 In Australia, like in much of the West, manufacturing is on the ropes.
 The export of manufacturing jobs to Eastern countries is going strong,
 however.  It's widely accepted that the car manufacturing industry will go.
 All the remaining three big manufacturers
 will close in
 either 2016 or 2017.  In fact, the Ford factory closed on Friday the 7th
 of October 2016.  The story is very similar to the British Motor Industry.
 Jaguar is owned by
 the Indian Car Manufacturer, Tata, 
  Rolls-Royce Motor Cars Limited
  is owned by BMW, Austin is gone, Morris is gone, and the list goes on and on.
 Recently, a contract for new railway carriages for the NSW railways went to
 South Korea, despite the fact that there is a concern that manufactures rolling
 stock in Newcastle, NSW.  The relevant government said that the South Korean bid
 was 25% lower and that there are no quality concerns.  In fact, as regards to
 quality...  Thank the unions, thank democracy.  For a while, the workers had
 it very good.  But they were, as the great unwashed always is, unable to see
 what was real and sustainable and what was only a socialist dream leading to
 a rude awakening.  As there was so little brain to wash, brainwashing them was
 an easy job.  Pie in the sky seemed so real.
 The only qualification needed to vote is to have reached the voting age.
 As if age brings intelligence.
 When all is said and done, a true democracy where the great masses get their
 wishes is nothing but mob rule.
Those getting the votes
 Before an aspirant politician can become a fully fledged politician, he or she
 must get enough votes to be elected.  That means he or she must be able to
 convince enough of the great unwashed to vote for him.  That means, first of all,
 he must maneuver himself into a position to become a candidate for the party
 with the best chance of winning his constituency.  Of course, he may stand as
 an independent, but that greatly diminishes his chances of getting elected.
 All that is needed depends on appearances.  The ability to get elected has
 nothing to do with the ability to manage a country or part thereof.  A minister
 of a portfolio needs no knowledge of his portfolio.  A hairdresser is often
 better qualified for her job than a minister of a portfolio for his portfolio.
 The people attracted to politics are by nature snake oil salesmen and women
 - all they need to do is to charm and smooth talk enough people to support them
 when they need that support.  They must know how to lead the fickle great
 unwashed by its collective dirty snout.  The ones who can see through them
 don't matter.  There are too few of those.
Democracy is not to be found in any field needing knowledge.  How would you feel if the surgeon going to operate on you were elected by the great unwashed from among any group of candidates who thought they'd like the pay of a surgeon?  Say the pilot of the plane in which you're going to fly were also elected.  And the engineers who designed and supervised the building of the huge bridge that's supposed to carry hundreds of thousands of cars a day had been elected.  How come it's fine that those at the head of a country need no knowledge?  All they need is enough of the great unwashed to vote for them.  Does this make sense?
 Being so dependent on the fickle masses makes a politician vulnerable.
 Anybody who can deliver on anything that can sway the great unwashed will
 have much influence with a politician.  Enter the lobbyists who control
 too few votes to make a difference at election time but have enough money
 which a cunning politician can use to sway votes his way.
 A few months ago, the NSW state government banned dog racing when it was
 discovered that there was much animal cruelty involved in it.  Of course, 
 there was the usual outcry by those involved in this shady (gambling)
 industry.  Just today (11 October 2016), TV news reported that the NSW
 government was going to reverse this ban.  I immediately wondered what
 the gambling bosses did to engineer the reversing of this ban.  Of course,
 we can expect no in depth reporting on what happened behind the scenes.
 There will be the usual claptrap providing a reason - stepped up supervision,
 promises to eradicate cruelty from the industry, etc.  But what will be offered
 won't be the real reason.  The nature of elected government officials is such 
 that by far the majority of people in whichever country expect them to
 behave dishonestly.  It is no surprise therefore that people are sceptical
 in a situation such as this.
 By far the majority of elected officials desperately want to keep their 
 jobs.  They want to remain where the pickings are rich and the pasture is
 lush.  To succeed in this, they must convince the voting cattle to give them
 enough votes come election time.  And for the voting cattle, being who they are,
 it's all about appearances.  And the politicians, being who they are, appearances
 is the one thing about which they are very good.  Reality takes a back seat.
 Politicians will do whatever is needed to stay in the pound seats - collude with
 whoever can turn the odds their way, promise the voting cattle whatever is needed
 to make them vote for the party or politician concerned, even if it will bankrupt
 the country or kill off industry.  Ask the Greeks and the English.
What else?
 Most people will now ask, what is better than democracy?  There is something,
 a country with a clear constitution and with laws flowing from that constitution.
 The biggest part of this constitution will be the same for all countries as people
 are people.  There will be parts addressing the particular circumstances of the
 individual countries.  This constitution should address everything, like the 
 best way the particular country can be economically viable, given its strenghts
 and weaknesses.  The constitution should embody what is best for the country and 
 the people, not what the hoi polloi wants.
 The above will never happen, though.  It will prevent predators, like gambling 
 bosses, booze barons, drug pushers, confidence tricksters and whore masters 
 preying on the all too prevalent simple minded.  And the simple minded will
 always be there in great numbers and those eager to prey on them, too.  So,
 don't hold your breath.  This is a world of predators and prey, with the 
 blessing of the government of whichever country you are in.